Here's the Video and Short Overview of How "Judicial Notice" Rigged Canadian Court Cases to Favor Government Policy, No Matter What the Facts Might Be.
Federal, State Officials Aiding Criminal Misconduct, Corruption, Injustice and Sexual Abuse "Under Color of Law"
Eighty traffic stops in four years. Five robberies. Home invasion and death threats by armed Sheriff Deputies with AR-15s and shotguns pointed at my head and at my dog "Boomer's" head while two young children were mere feet away on a second floor. False arrest. False imprisonment. Actionable evidence including recordings, documents, hundreds of witnesses contact information with no conflicts of interest esp. regarding crimes against children involving rape and abuse.
Only EXTERNAL demands might drive long-overdue official accountability, investigation, oversight, an end to abuses, brutality, crimes of a community & local, State & Federal corruption that would shock most Americans. It sounds unbelievable, but is very much real in Wilmington N.C.
Though provided irrefutable almost certainly admissible evidence of criminal activities involving:
U.S. Department of Justice & F.B.I. involvement in extensive criminal misconduct by Corrupt North Carolina officials including sexual abuses of children, theft of Federal funds, lynching's, retaliatory murders, torture, violence & retribution against child victims, families & the few who have dared discuss horrific abuses suffered & retaliation by officials, prosecutors & bribed media.
This "Culture of Corruption," once pursued, is now Assisted, Protected by the U.S. DOJ, FBI USAO despite vast evidence & growing #s of victims of violent criminal acts that any remotely moral person would conclude:
CONGRESS MUST HOLD THESE FEDERAL OFFICIALS AND THE STATE AND LOCAL SADISTIC CRIMINALS OFFICIALLY PROTECTED TO ACCOUNT.
NO OFFICIAL WHO ENGAGES IN SUCH EVIL SHOULD EVER BE MAINTAINED OR SUPPORTED IN OR ALLOWED TO HOLD PUBLIC OFFICE OR PRACTICE LAW EVER.
Thank you for this Chuck. I know little about legal matters, but, as I see it, the courts are one of the primary institutional establishments that most people rely on to derive their understanding of the world and of what is right and wrong. This twist in the meaning and use of judicial notice is crucial to the circumstances which led Canadians to succumb to the mass illusion regarding the safety and effectiveness of the Covid “vaccines”. Perhaps there is some hope that the illusion can be dispelled by removing one of the linchpins, i.e. the prevailing (mis)use of judicial notice.
Frankly, VCC lost support when Rocco Galati appeared on a podcast and angrily snapped at someone asking a fairly reasonable question. That's on top of nearly having the entire proceeding thrown out at the first hearing because of the "scattershot" brief you mention, although the judge was gracious enough to give Galati a second chance to return with a more focused, much shorter brief to present to court. (Something less than 300 pages, thank you.) This from the self-declared "top constitutional lawyer in Canada"? If Galati is really what he claims, why would he make such a rookie mistake? Unless he was just milking VCC for cash. Or worse.
I argue only that the "missteps" from VCC and other litigants over the last four years were caused by a lack of understanding of how the concept of judicial notice had changed since 1995.
I also suggest that the "scattershot" brief, while perhaps appropriate for arguing a court case using the 1995 understanding of the concept of judicial notice, couldn't compete in a courtroom where government agents can make absolute pronouncements on almost any topic without the need for formal proof, witnesses and/or independent evidence.
This corruption of the original concept of judicial notice insures that, at least in current Canadian courts, you can’t disagree with government policy or government statements of facts under any circumstances.
That's a truly chilling development. It reminds me of the old expression, "framing mischief by decree." Podcaster Viva Frei, in a recent interview with Redacted News, said he believes the judicial system is currently in a chaos of lawlessness, when "lawfare" can be weaponized against political opponents to take them out of the presidential race before voters even hit the polls.
"Over the short run, the only recourse within the current Canadian court system is to appeal the decision to a higher court."
I respectfully disagree with this statement.
Having independently studied, and continuing to independently study, Canadian law in the past 2 years, I am charting out multiple avenues of recourse, with one being very novel indeed.
In example of one more conventional approach, from the Ontario perspective, would be under subsection 109 (1)(1) of the Courts of Justice Act, and not under subsection (2) for reason the Charter is a seditious instrument, made so, in part, because of Section 1.
For the novel approach, well that takes some learning. About what? About the Constitution Act 1867. It is not until we learn how Canada's supreme law should be applied that we shall see how to end the biggest CON that has been played against the people since the dawn of the Westminster Code.
Thanks for the response, Amanda. I look forward to hearing more commentary from you and your colleagues.
Just remember that the laws you intend to use need to be widely understood by the existing court officers as being appropriate for the purpose for which you intend to use them.
Otherwise they'll strike your challenge down and remove you from the courtroom.
https://justice4all.substack.com/p/federal-state-officials-aiding-criminal-662
Federal, State Officials Aiding Criminal Misconduct, Corruption, Injustice and Sexual Abuse "Under Color of Law"
Eighty traffic stops in four years. Five robberies. Home invasion and death threats by armed Sheriff Deputies with AR-15s and shotguns pointed at my head and at my dog "Boomer's" head while two young children were mere feet away on a second floor. False arrest. False imprisonment. Actionable evidence including recordings, documents, hundreds of witnesses contact information with no conflicts of interest esp. regarding crimes against children involving rape and abuse.
Only EXTERNAL demands might drive long-overdue official accountability, investigation, oversight, an end to abuses, brutality, crimes of a community & local, State & Federal corruption that would shock most Americans. It sounds unbelievable, but is very much real in Wilmington N.C.
Though provided irrefutable almost certainly admissible evidence of criminal activities involving:
U.S. Department of Justice & F.B.I. involvement in extensive criminal misconduct by Corrupt North Carolina officials including sexual abuses of children, theft of Federal funds, lynching's, retaliatory murders, torture, violence & retribution against child victims, families & the few who have dared discuss horrific abuses suffered & retaliation by officials, prosecutors & bribed media.
This "Culture of Corruption," once pursued, is now Assisted, Protected by the U.S. DOJ, FBI USAO despite vast evidence & growing #s of victims of violent criminal acts that any remotely moral person would conclude:
CONGRESS MUST HOLD THESE FEDERAL OFFICIALS AND THE STATE AND LOCAL SADISTIC CRIMINALS OFFICIALLY PROTECTED TO ACCOUNT.
NO OFFICIAL WHO ENGAGES IN SUCH EVIL SHOULD EVER BE MAINTAINED OR SUPPORTED IN OR ALLOWED TO HOLD PUBLIC OFFICE OR PRACTICE LAW EVER.
https://justice4all.substack.com/p/federal-state-officials-aiding-criminal-662
I'm open Brian.
But this post seems a little bit off topic.
The video is muffled - is there a version posted somewhere with higher volume? Can't make out all the words. Thanks!
There's a partial version of the video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxNwCwcdq4Q. It doesn't include the questions, but perhaps it will be useful.
Sorry about the confusion.
Thank you. And thank you for your work on this. Very much appreciated.
Thank you for this Chuck. I know little about legal matters, but, as I see it, the courts are one of the primary institutional establishments that most people rely on to derive their understanding of the world and of what is right and wrong. This twist in the meaning and use of judicial notice is crucial to the circumstances which led Canadians to succumb to the mass illusion regarding the safety and effectiveness of the Covid “vaccines”. Perhaps there is some hope that the illusion can be dispelled by removing one of the linchpins, i.e. the prevailing (mis)use of judicial notice.
Agreed. Thanks for the comment, Andrew.
Frankly, VCC lost support when Rocco Galati appeared on a podcast and angrily snapped at someone asking a fairly reasonable question. That's on top of nearly having the entire proceeding thrown out at the first hearing because of the "scattershot" brief you mention, although the judge was gracious enough to give Galati a second chance to return with a more focused, much shorter brief to present to court. (Something less than 300 pages, thank you.) This from the self-declared "top constitutional lawyer in Canada"? If Galati is really what he claims, why would he make such a rookie mistake? Unless he was just milking VCC for cash. Or worse.
I agree with most of what you say, Sean.
I argue only that the "missteps" from VCC and other litigants over the last four years were caused by a lack of understanding of how the concept of judicial notice had changed since 1995.
I also suggest that the "scattershot" brief, while perhaps appropriate for arguing a court case using the 1995 understanding of the concept of judicial notice, couldn't compete in a courtroom where government agents can make absolute pronouncements on almost any topic without the need for formal proof, witnesses and/or independent evidence.
This corruption of the original concept of judicial notice insures that, at least in current Canadian courts, you can’t disagree with government policy or government statements of facts under any circumstances.
That's a truly chilling development. It reminds me of the old expression, "framing mischief by decree." Podcaster Viva Frei, in a recent interview with Redacted News, said he believes the judicial system is currently in a chaos of lawlessness, when "lawfare" can be weaponized against political opponents to take them out of the presidential race before voters even hit the polls.
"Over the short run, the only recourse within the current Canadian court system is to appeal the decision to a higher court."
I respectfully disagree with this statement.
Having independently studied, and continuing to independently study, Canadian law in the past 2 years, I am charting out multiple avenues of recourse, with one being very novel indeed.
In example of one more conventional approach, from the Ontario perspective, would be under subsection 109 (1)(1) of the Courts of Justice Act, and not under subsection (2) for reason the Charter is a seditious instrument, made so, in part, because of Section 1.
For the novel approach, well that takes some learning. About what? About the Constitution Act 1867. It is not until we learn how Canada's supreme law should be applied that we shall see how to end the biggest CON that has been played against the people since the dawn of the Westminster Code.
I'm writing and publishing the applicable knowledge as fast as I can, and using https://www.canadianlawstudygroup.com/canada-stands-2024-operation-take-back as the catch all page to collect all the relevant articles and for launching the STAND I intend to take.
There are so many underutilized rules of law not being used to our advantage...maybe it's time for a second look...
#therulesrule
#CanadaStands2024
Thanks for the response, Amanda. I look forward to hearing more commentary from you and your colleagues.
Just remember that the laws you intend to use need to be widely understood by the existing court officers as being appropriate for the purpose for which you intend to use them.
Otherwise they'll strike your challenge down and remove you from the courtroom.
Good luck.